[c-nsp] Layer 3 on an ES+ EVC

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:19:31PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
> We did ask our SE about why we can't just have regular sub-
> interfaces, but that was a long time ago and I don't quite 
> remember what we concluded, except that I think it's not 
> going to be possible.

After all, how can you see that you bought such an expensive card if
the bonus features are just hidden under a common UI?

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20110830/ad51e61e/attachment.pgp>