[c-nsp] Layer 3 on an ES+ EVC

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 12:52:20 AM Saku Ytti wrote:

> Now EVC is just another type of logical subinterface and
> it is very confusing operationally why there needs to be
> two type of them.

Same here.

We're trying to make the most of the situation by making 
sure all our features can exist under the EVC, rather than 
calling on an SVI and referencing that as a bridge domain in 
the respective EFP.

Something tells me this will be difficult for IP.

We did ask our SE about why we can't just have regular sub-
interfaces, but that was a long time ago and I don't quite 
remember what we concluded, except that I think it's not 
going to be possible.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20110830/6c2452e6/attachment.pgp>