[c-nsp] auto versioning of device configs, ala RANCID or ??

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 01:08:57PM +0000, John Brown wrote:
> RANCID is what we have used in the past.  Just wondering if there is something "newer / better"

The canonical answer seems to be RANCID.

We use our own system which is more closely integrated into our ticketing
and change management (and doesn't have that smell of TCL) - but under the
hood, it does the same things, so if you start from scratch, use Rancid :-)

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20111208/024510e6/attachment.sig>