[c-nsp] Re : Re : BFD on ASR 9000
Marc Binderberger
marc at sniff.de
Tue Feb 1 11:35:14 EST 2011
Hello,
odd. There was a restriction for BGP requesting BFD on Vlan on a _Bundle_. Normal interfaces should work though.
Sorry, no further idea ... .
Regards, Marc
On 2011-02-01, at 3:08 PM, chams wrote:
> Hi,
> it's a TengigaEthernet interface, but i'm using sub interfaces.
> And, right, the bgp is UP.
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Message d'origine ----
> De : Marc Binderberger <marc at sniff.de>
> À : chams <chams_b at yahoo.fr>
> Cc : Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de>; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Envoyé le : Mar 1 février 2011, 14h 58min 12s
> Objet : Re: [c-nsp] Re : BFD on ASR 9000
>
> Hello Chams,
>
>> My firewall is using bfd and when typing "show bfd session" on it, it shows me
>
>> down sessions
>
> problem #2 solved :-)
>
>
>> and here is the "show bfd client", (i'm using bfd for my ISIS configuration)
>>
>> Name Node Num sessions
>> --------------- ---------- --------------
>> MPLS-TE 0/RSP0/CPU 3
>> bgp-0 0/RSP0/CPU 0
>> bgp-0 0/RSP1/CPU 0
>> ipv4_static 0/RSP0/CPU 0
>> ipv4_static 0/RSP1/CPU 0
>> isis-IGP-MPLS 0/RSP0/CPU 3
>> isis-IGP-MPLS 0/RSP1/CPU 0
>> pim 0/RSP0/CPU 3
>> pim 0/RSP1/CPU 0
>> rsvp 0/RSP0/CPU 0
>> rsvp 0/RSP1/CPU 0
>
>
> So BGP is not telling BFD anything about the session it wants - "0".
> Thus "show bfd session" shows nothing about it.
>
> Odd. The eBGP session between ASR and FW is UP, right? What kind of
> interface it this? I would guess (gig-)Ethernet but better ask. Vlans in
> the game?
>
>
> Regards, Marc
>
>> ----- Message d'origine ----
>> De : Marc Binderberger <marc at sniff.de>
>> À : Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de>
>> Cc : chams <chams_b at yahoo.fr>; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Envoyé le : Mar 1 février 2011, 13h 42min 16s
>> Objet : Re: [c-nsp] BFD on ASR 9000
>>
>>
>> Hello Gerd and Chams,
>>
>>> My guess is that your unnamed firewall doesn't do BFD...
>>
>> that is problem #2 ;-) - but it still should show up with "show bfd session"
>> on the ASR9k as a DOWN session.
>>
>> The eBGP session must be non-multihop, i.e. it must be between the
>> addresses of the link ASR9k--FW. I assume this is what you mean
>> with point-to-point?
>>
>> BFD really doesn't know anything about "i" or "e"-BGP. All it requires
>> is a "bfd fast-detect" line under the BGP neighbor.
>>
>> What is "show bfd client" showing?
>>
>>
>> Regards, Marc
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:31:10AM +0000, chams wrote:
>>>> I have to configure a bfd session between my ASR and a Firewall, over a BGP
>>
>>>> session.
>>>> but after configuration i ca't even see the configured session when doing a
>>
>>>> "show bfd session".
>>>> by reading some cisco docs, i've seen that BFD can be configured onlu on
>
>>> point
>>>
>>>> to point eBGP session, my ASR and Firewall have an eBGP point to point
>>> session
>>>
>>>> but they belong to the same confederation (perhaps BFD see it as iBGP
>>> session)
>>>
>>> My guess is that your unnamed firewall doesn't do BFD...
>>>
>>> gert
>>> --
>>> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>>>
>> //www.muc.de/~gert/
>>> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
> gert at greenie.muc.de
>>> fax: +49-89-35655025
>> gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
>>
>>
>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>> --
>> Marc Binderberger <marc at sniff.de> Powered by *BSD ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> --
> Marc Binderberger <marc at sniff.de> Powered by *BSD ;-)
>
>
>
>
>
--
Marc Binderberger <marc at sniff.de>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list