[c-nsp] TTL not decrementing (MPLS, SXI, Sup720)
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Sat Feb 12 06:49:36 EST 2011
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 05:17:56PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Like IPv6, I think it would be reasonable to add "must
> support hop-by-hop traceroute" for upstream bids, since
> everyone loves to run MPLS these days, even when it's
> probably unnecessary.
We actually seem to manage to put our money where our mouth is on
this round of upstream contract renegotiations - going away from
one of our current ISPs that does TTL hiding, to one that doesn't.
(MPLS is a useful tool, and MPLS TE can actually add lots of value to an
upstream provider's offering *iff* properly managed - but I want to *see*
where my packets travel, and where they detour)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20110212/80c5704e/attachment.pgp>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list