[c-nsp] Older Cisco Routers - which one to go with?
Peter Rathlev
peter at rathlev.dk
Thu Feb 17 16:12:29 EST 2011
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 15:10 -0500, Keegan Holley wrote:
> I wouldn't use the 2651 for much else than maybe a door-stop.
Agreed, but a functional and pretty door-stop at that. :-)
> The 2801 might not be able to do 20M ethernet depending on what else
> you are asking it to do.
We recently had to introduce some temporary[0] ugliness consisting in
one end of a plain 2801[1] terminating traffic in a GRE tunnel. We could
pull 90 Mbps (max MTU) without it breaking a sweat. It was doing nothing
else of course.
> Can you use a switch here? If it's all ethernet than a 3560 or
> even a 3550/3750 would be fine. They even have 8 port 3560's for
> cheap.
For this purpose -- servicing a sub-linerate Ethernet circuit -- a
switch would IMO be a terrible choice. With a 2801 you can shape the
interface to 20 Mbps and use LLQ inside this shaper. The 3560 can do
nothing of the sort.
[0]: Normally (for us) the denomination "temporary" means a badly
implemented but almost permanent solution. This one was actually
temporary. :-)
[1]: Plain 2801 w/ 128MB RAM running 12.4(24)T4 Enterprise Base
--
Peter
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list