[c-nsp] Older Cisco Routers - which one to go with?

Peter Rathlev peter at rathlev.dk
Thu Feb 17 16:12:29 EST 2011


On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 15:10 -0500, Keegan Holley wrote:
> I wouldn't use the 2651 for much else than maybe a door-stop.

Agreed, but a functional and pretty door-stop at that. :-)

> The 2801 might not be able to do 20M ethernet depending on what else
> you are asking it to do.

We recently had to introduce some temporary[0] ugliness consisting in
one end of a plain 2801[1] terminating traffic in a GRE tunnel. We could
pull 90 Mbps (max MTU) without it breaking a sweat. It was doing nothing
else of course.

> Can you use a switch here?  If it's all ethernet than a 3560 or
> even a 3550/3750 would be fine.  They even have 8 port 3560's for
> cheap.

For this purpose -- servicing a sub-linerate Ethernet circuit -- a
switch would IMO be a terrible choice. With a 2801 you can shape the
interface to 20 Mbps and use LLQ inside this shaper. The 3560 can do
nothing of the sort.


[0]: Normally (for us) the denomination "temporary" means a badly
     implemented but almost permanent solution. This one was actually
     temporary. :-)

[1]: Plain 2801 w/ 128MB RAM running 12.4(24)T4 Enterprise Base

-- 
Peter





More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list