[c-nsp] Catalyst reloads (was Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?

Pete Lumbis alumbis at gmail.com
Tue Jan 11 17:20:00 EST 2011


You could connect a console and just leave it logging until the next
reload. I haven't seen it on switches, but I've see other boxes crash
without writing a crashinfo file. If it crashes or reloads for any
software related reason it will probably show something in the
console.

-Pete

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Jeff Kell <jeff-kell at utc.edu> wrote:
> On 1/11/2011 11:29 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>> The cisco-nsp mailing list is often much more helpful than TAC.
>
> On that note... does this ring any bells?
>
> Have a 3750E that has had spurious reloads (4 since Friday), was
> switch-1 of a 3-member stack, initially was the master, now switch-2 has
> taken over as master.   Show version on the failing one just shows
>
>> FunnyFarm-1 uptime is 17 hours, 48 minutes
>> System returned to ROM by power-on
>
> The other members have 23-week uptimes.
>
> There's no crashinfo in the logs, no "software forced reload" type
> reload events.
>
> TAC insists power was cut to the switch (four times?).
>
> Stack members are in a pair of self-contained, self-cooling Liebert
> racks, 240v PDUs, different phases of a 3-phase supply, dual UPS,
> generator backup, it's your "above average" server room.  There are
> dozens of servers in these racks (3 x 48-port 3750Es full, mostly
> dual-connected) and nothing has burped whatsoever.
>
> Running 12.2(53)SE2 IPServices.  Stack has been up almost 6 months
> (switch-3, a 3750X, was added about 4 months ago and has a 19-week
> uptime).  No incidents until Friday, and no changes then that we can
> identify.
>
> Jeff
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list