[c-nsp] IPv6 BGP on IOS-XR

[Lee Starnes]

Hi Scott,

We are speaking with the IPv6 address for the peering and a separate IPv4
address for IPv4 peering. We have a route-policy that does a deny local and
permit all others for inbound and a route policy that permits our /32
outbound. Just kind of strange that it does not announce to them.

-Lee

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Scott Granados <scott at granados-llc.net>wrote:

> So I could be way way off here so take with many grains of salt.
>   Can't speak for IPV6 but with V4 they use an A / B peering arrangement
> for customer links.  Are you sure you're announcing your routes to the
> correct peer?  If they do IPV6 with a single address then sorry for the
> misdirection but with IPV4 they definitely use a pair of sessions.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Lee Starnes
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 2:33 PM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] IPv6 BGP on IOS-XR
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone have any recommended reading for doing IPv6 BGP peering on
> IOS-XR? We setup our peer with Cogent and can get full routes in, but can't
> seem to figure out how to announce our /32. I had assumed it setup just the
> same way as IPv4, but can't seem to get it to announce out. I did some
> searching on Cisco's site, but didn't really find anything that pertained
> to
> how/what to announce and what not to announce.
>
> We are running version 4.0.1
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lee
> ______________________________**_________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp>
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/**pipermail/cisco-nsp/<http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/>
>