[c-nsp] Cisco ISR G2 and comp-lzs

[Nikolay Shopik]

Well it's really depends, but I tend to agree, my show crypto engine 
accelerator statistic, 1.8:1 compression ratio and overall is 1.1:1.

On 30/06/11 18:59, P C wrote:
> Traditional applications of this have been low speed links (Dial-up, ISDN,
> etc.).  I've never tried it on anything faster.  I will say, generally
> per-packet compression isn't as efficient as you might hope.
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Mark Mason<MMason at jackhenry.com>  wrote:
>
>> To me it seems that comp-lzs documentation is old as dirt. Obviously it
>> still works in almost all environments and in some it offers a huge benefit.
>> Does anyone have real world numbers with comp-lzs running on new ISR G2's?
>> ISR G2's have a higher-performing encryption accelerator that could
>> increase the VPN performance three to five times that of the previous ISR
>> G1's. To me, it seems like throwing lzs on top of that isn't going to gain
>> much more. Thoughts?
>>
>> Mark Mason
>>
>> NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are
>> intended
>> exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The
>> message,
>> together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged
>> information.
>> Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or
>> distribution
>> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
>> immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/