[c-nsp] 3845 maxing out at 400 Mbps

Frank Bulk frnkblk at iname.com
Tue Mar 29 00:05:11 EDT 2011


Packet sizes are believed to be roughly equivalent between both 3845's
because our upstream is just preffing some subnets toward one path than
another.  I checked everything CEF/interface related on both routers and it
all appears to be correct and healthy.

Thanks,

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tony Varriale
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 10:24 PM
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 3845 maxing out at 400 Mbps

On 3/28/2011 9:14 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> We have two 3845's as border routers, each with three GigE interfaces (one
> facing upstream, the other downstream, the third facing the other 3845).
> The first 3845 has a typical packet-size mix (residential/business
Internet)
> is consistently maxing out at 400 Mbps (predominately ingress because of
> asymmetric routing) running at about 43 kpps and 40% CPU.  It's flat-lines
> very evenly, uncannily so.  We checked and double-checked transport and
it's
> set much higher, the same as the second 3845.
>
> The second 3845, which has a mix of both ingress and egress traffic at a
> combined 82 kpps (35 kpps ingress/50 kpps egress) but lower combined 360
> Mbps operates at a higher CPU (presumably because there's also egress
> traffic) with no flatlining.
>
> The ACLs are BCP 38-oriented with eBGP; no rate-limiting.  We're running
> 124-11.XW2.
>
> Any ideas?  The numbers are well below Cisco's router spec sheet.
>
> Frank
The first idea is pretty obvious: different packet sizes.  Why so?  The 
second idea would be to make sure you are staying in the CEF path as 
much as possible.  Verify that yet?

tv

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list