[c-nsp] Open Source netflow recommendations
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Wed May 18 10:38:39 EDT 2011
Hi,
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 03:20:14PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Juniper are still pushing the "here's the hardware, but if you actually
> want to use it, we're going to gouge you for more" model for netflow.
> Thankfully, Cisco aren't doing this on any of their platforms.
Have they abandoned that? $Earlier versions of IOS on 7200s required a
(pricey!) netflow license.
... and I wouldn't be surprised to see extra licenses for netflow on
the ES line cards and for $anythingonCRS1...
From what we hear from colleagues that got CRS1, Cisco is fully back in
"need extra licenses for anything!" land now - *plus* "the hardware
enforces licenses" *and* "their license management is seriously fubared"
(this is how the story goes: power outage, CRS-1 came back without any
valid licenses, took TAC a week to restore licenses). Well, colleagues
have learned, and will never ever buy anything again that requires
licenses to be stored on the device...
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20110518/a903019b/attachment.pgp>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list