[c-nsp] OC-48 transport over Cisco 6500

[FF]

Thanks for responding. I'm looking at something like this:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps2831/ps4370/product_data_sheet09186a0080092241.html

Will someone connecting to this for OC-48 transport between two
locations with MPLS encapsulation (xconnect) notice anything different
via a normal mux port? I think what you're saying is, "no". :)

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Mack McBride <mack.mcbride at viawest.com> wrote:
> The POS looks like a standard 6500 layer 3 port with of course the added POS commands.
> This means standard MPLS commands should work.
> The older POS cards lack some of the functionality of the newer cards.
> Someone may have more information if you provide the exact line card.
>
> Mack McBride
> Network Architect
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of FF
> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 9:25 PM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] OC-48 transport over Cisco 6500
>
> If I'm trying to transport OC-48 between two customer locations via
> MPLS on a Cisco 6500...
>
> Would simple MPLS/xconnect work using the appropriate OC-48-OSM on
> each side? [i.e., will the OC-48-OSM look like a traditional SONET
> interface such as one would see from a 15454 or similar mux to the
> customer equipment?]
>
> thanks in advance,
>
> --
>
> FF
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>



-- 
FF