[c-nsp] OSPF issue

John Elliot johnelliot67 at hotmail.com
Wed Nov 16 18:28:05 EST 2011


Hi Guys - Just following up on this issue...Carrier is stating that they are not filtering multicast(support case is still open, but we appear to be getting nowhere)
If I ping 224.0.0.5 from R2, I do not get a response from R1 via the "new" link - Also, debugging icmp on r1, I only see requests from R2 via the existing(working) link, so the multicast pings are not reaching R1 via the "new" link.
R1(7206 w/ G1) connects via trunk to 3750(As portchan), and the carrier hand-off is via trunk port on the same 3750 - The switch is not doing any L3, has no filtering of multicast enabled...Am I seeing a potential ios bug?
Any suggestions are greatly appreciated!
 

Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 09:55:24 +0100
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPF issue
From: kimaru at gmail.com
To: johnelliot67 at hotmail.com
CC: jay at west.net; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net

It looks like it's actually multicast packets that are getting filtered somehow. MPLS (LDP) is also making use of it for discovering the neighbors (224.0.0.2). Untill you get the multicast issue sorted with your carrier, you could do a targeted (unicast) discovery for LDP. that should work.


On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 2:51 AM, John Elliot <johnelliot67 at hotmail.com> wrote:





Cheers guys - It would appear that there is some filtering of ospf on this new link...I've changed both ends ints to non-broadcast, and added nei statements to ospf, and we now have adj that's been up for ~30min.




Neighbor ID     Pri   State           Dead Time   Address         Interfacexxx.xxx.76.248    1   FULL/DR         00:01:37    xxx.xxx.66.62   Port-channel1.87xxx.xxx.76.248    1   FULL/DR         00:00:31    xxx.xxx.66.2    FastEthernet3/0


Ill get onto carrier tomorrow regarding the multicast filtering.Side note - Is there any potential issues with running mpls over this link(As I dont see ldp neig on R1 for R2):#sh mpls ldp neighbor port-channel 1.87(I do see ldp nei on R2 though(via both portchan1.86 + portchan1.87))Thanks again for your assistance.....much appreciated!




> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 15:49:57 -0800

> From: jay at west.net

> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net

> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPF issue

>

> On 11/12/11 3:26 PM, John Elliot wrote:

>

> > Ok - enabling point-to-point on each of the "new" ints on R1+R2, and it now doesnt form adj.

> >

> > R1 no longer sees R2 in neighbors via "new" Int:

> >

> >

> > Neighbor ID     Pri   State           Dead Time   Address         Interfacexxx.xxx.76.248    1   FULL/DR         00:00:35    xxx.xxx.66.2    FastEthernet3/0

> >

> > R2 is stuck in init:

> >

> >

> > Neighbor ID     Pri   State           Dead Time   Address         Interfacexxx.xxx.76.238    0   INIT/  -        00:00:36    xxx.xxx.66.61   Port-channel1.87

> > xxx.xxx.76.238    1   FULL/BDR        00:00:30    xxx.xxx.66.1    Port-channel1.86

>

> Based on your previous post re multicast pings, it may be that your

> provider isn't passing multicast.  If this is the case you can either

> get them to fix this (best) or statically assign neighbors in router

> config mode (sort of an ugly hack).

>

> The results of "show ip ospf interface [interface name]" on both sides

> after configuring point-to-point on the interfaces would be useful

> information.

>

> --

> Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay at impulse.net

> Impulse Internet Service  -  http://www.impulse.net/

> Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV

> _______________________________________________

> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net

> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



_______________________________________________

cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net

https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


 		 	   		  


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list