[c-nsp] ASA vs. ASR for large Wireless NAT deployment ?

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:59:53PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
> We've deployed some ASR1006's for NAT44 and NAT64.
> 
> The NAT44 is for our IPTv VoD service (Unicast), while the 
> NAT64 is for IPv6-only customers trying to reach IPv4-only 
> resources.

Can you give some more details on that?  You really have IPv6-only
customers?

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20111122/e57343ca/attachment.sig>