[c-nsp] ASA vs. ASR for large Wireless NAT deployment ?

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday, November 22, 2011 05:55:09 PM Gert Doering 
wrote:

> Can you give some more details on that?  You really have
> IPv6-only customers?

Not yet :-). Only test subjects, today.

We're anticipating this scenario when we serve up our final 
v4 address to customers. Projection is about 2 - 3 years 
from now based on customer growth, but we've already 
implemented and tested NAT64 on the ASR1006, and are 
developing it internally + with Cisco as needed.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20111128/443f7824/attachment.sig>