[c-nsp] Subnetting problem

[-Hammer-]

Yes, I think ACLs are covered. Just not route statements. I can see the 
bad coming out of it as well so I'm not complaining too much.

-Hammer-

"I was a normal American nerd"
-Jack Herer



On 10/06/2011 04:30 PM, Chuck Church wrote:
> Won't it do that for ACLs?
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jay Nakamura
> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 5:07 PM
> To: -Hammer-
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Subnetting problem
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:41 PM, -Hammer-<bhmccie at gmail.com>  wrote:
>    
>> Not to stir up any emotions here but it would be convenient if IOS would
>>      
> recognize .4 (based on the /29 mask) as part of the subnet starting with .0
> and just throw it in for you. But I guess we don't want to dumb ourselves
> down to much....
>
>
> I feel like some IOS has done that to me before.  Distinctly remember
> putting the wrong net address in and reviewing the config, found that
> it changed it to the correct one.  Hmmm...  May be it wasn't IOS.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>