[c-nsp] Downsides of combining P and PE functions into a single box
Mark Tinka
mtinka at globaltransit.net
Sun Oct 23 02:16:06 EDT 2011
On Friday, October 21, 2011 07:08:15 AM Phil Bedard wrote:
> Having a
> separate core also sets us up for some of the devices
> coming in the future which may take the place of a full
> featured MPLS router with something with a simplified
> control/forwarding plane (stripped-down LSR) or a device
> with combined packet/optical which can take the place of
> both our P nodes and DWDM transport nodes. I'd like to
> see more virtualization to be able to use the same
> chassis/line cards as two separate routers and the
> ability to virtually connect them via an internal
> fabric. I know this is doable on the multi-chassis
> systems from C/J but those systems are expensive and add
> additional complexity.
Juniper's disappointing PTX router was meant to make this
possible with their Express Chip. But I think they missed
the mark here, and even though both Cisco and Juniper can
develop cheap, high-speed 1U P routers, they probably won't.
As of today, your best bet is a CRS with FP-* line cards, or
the ASR9000; or Juniper's MX.
I'm not yet sure IPoDWDM + SDR (logical systems on a
Juniper) is ready to do enough to make what you state,
above, a real reality.
> Right now the reason collapsing is a non-starter is we
> don't have the density on any current MPLS router to use
> a combined P/PE in most locations unless we go to
> multi-chassis configurations.
The ASR9922 is probably what you're looking for, although it
might be a little big for the smallest of PoP's, unless you
can achieve huge savings in your P/PE deployment.
The competition has something similar in the pipeline as
well, but as it's not yet official, I'll keep my mouth shut
for now :-).
Cheers,
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20111023/07dd7cc0/attachment.pgp>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list