[c-nsp] ASR-1001 bgp memory usage

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 09:25:46PM +0200, Christian Kratzer wrote:
> I will definetely want to do more research on this and open a case with our 
> cisco contacts. We do not have redundant IOS processes as I was able to 
> verify now and the box has 4 GB of ram so I would expect to see 2 GB for 
> IOS on accounts of above posting but we are only seeing 1 GB usable ram.

The wonders of modern software architecture.

Could someone explain to me again what's so great about IOS XE, and why
IOS XR or NX-OS or anything else halfway decent is not used on these 
platforms, except "because another business unit made it"?

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20110921/b108ffdf/attachment.pgp>