[c-nsp] Huawei NE40E-X3 vs Cisco AS9K

[Waseem]

how do you route for customers who don't have BGP? /30 on the interface then static route the prefix or the prefix on the inteface?
because, the latter causes a lot of ARP and Spanning tree traffic.

Waseem



----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Loch <kloch at kl.net>
To: NSP <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Cc: 
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 1:26 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Huawei NE40E-X3 vs Cisco AS9K

70% seems *really* high an for rsp720.  Are you sure it's
not a sup720?  The two have vastly different cpu performance
(about 10x it seems).  I have several rsp720 with many full
bgp transit feeds + peer routes and my typical cpu usage is
only 10%. What IOS image are you running and what else are
you doing on this box besides bgp that could be eating cpu?

I had one rsp720 recently (curiously the only one I have
seen with 4g ram instead of 2g) that had 70% cpu usage after
a few bgp sessions came up.  The 'show ibc' output indicated
several hundred thousand pps to and from the RP so something
was obviously wrong.  Swapped out with a different rsp720
and everything was fine (10% cpu, 100pps on IBC).

- Kevin



Manuel Marín wrote:
> We are using the RSP720 and 3CXLs. Both have performance issues when dealing
> with multiple BGP sessions, When one of the full bgp peer flaps or when
> there is a link flap the other routing protocols start to flap as well. I'll
> try to tweak the timers in the mean time. Usually the CPU usage is around
> 70%.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Waseem <waseem_aliraqi at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Manuel,
>>
>> What are the supervisor engines that you are using on the 7600 routers.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Waseem
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Waseem <waseem_aliraqi at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi,
>>
>> We've been in the same situation, a small note: per slot capacity of the
>> ASR9K is 320G it takes 40G and 100G SPAs while for NE40E-X3 is 40G, almost
>> the same as Cisco's 7600.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Waseem
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Manuel Marín <mmg at transtelco.net>
>> *To:* cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 28, 2011 9:56 AM
>> *Subject:* [c-nsp] Huawei NE40E-X3 vs Cisco AS9K
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> We are currently looking for alternatives to upgrade cisco 76XX  routers
>> and
>> we are comparing Huawei NE40E-X3 vs Cisco ASR9K. I was wondering if someone
>> can share their experience with Huawey routers as Core MPLS routers.
>>
>> Any advice would be greatly appreciated
>>
>> Thanks
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Manuel Marín
>> Transtelco Inc.
>> 1.9152172232
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/