[c-nsp] Huawei NE40E-X3 vs Cisco AS9K

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Fri Sep 30 07:29:22 EDT 2011


Hi,

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 04:14:34AM -0700, Waseem wrote:
> how do you route for customers who don't have BGP? /30 on the interface then static route the prefix or the prefix on the inteface?
> because, the latter causes a lot of ARP and Spanning tree traffic.

*via* the interface *to* the gateway

interface vlan417
  ip addr 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.252

ip route 192.0.2.0 255.255.255.0 vlan417 10.0.0.1

never ever point a route to a broadcast interface unless you *want* it
to generate ARP traffic for every IP address in there.


(Including the interface in a route when there is a gateway set is good
practice, though, as the route will go away if vlan417 goes to "down",
instead of dangling around and causing mishap)

((ObRant: Proxy-ARP on-by-default is one of the most stupid moves Cisco 
ever made, nearly as bad as the 6500/7600 BU split))

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20110930/a66ddf24/attachment-0001.pgp>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list