[c-nsp] IPv6 weirdness

[Randy]

On 12/08/2012 1:14 pm, Tóth András wrote:
> The first case shows /64 while the second is /128 as John pointed out
> as well. Perhaps the Vlan interface (SVI) was in down state, 
> therefore
> the router did not have the /128 receive entry and the address was
> covered by a "backup" /64 static route instead.

I didn't do a sh interface (unfortunately).  Nothing logged.  However, 
there are a couple dozen identical interfaces (different users / 
environments) that are fine and this is the first time I've seen this 
happen.   There are many dozens of VM's on this VLAN that could be doing 
'bad things'.  Rogue RA?  VLAN is fine since the bounce.  I'm still at a 
loss.

-- 
~Randy