[c-nsp] Cisco's new 4500-X 10G Aggregation Switches

[harbor235]

I am sure it will do V6, but is the hardware optimized for V6?
V6 hardware forwarding and TCAMs able to handle the tens of millions of
routes
expected. Perhaps there will be incremental updates so they can soak us
thoroughly

So, will it do V6 well is the real question?

Mike



2012/2/10 Łukasz Bromirski <lukasz at bromirski.net>

> On 2012-02-10 19:58, Gert Doering wrote:
>
>  What about IPv6?
>>
>
> It's a Sup7E in a box. Expect the same features and caveats.
>
> --
> "There's no sense in being precise when |               Łukasz Bromirski
>  you don't know what you're talking     |      jid:lbromirski at jabber.org
>  about."               John von Neumann |    http://lukasz.bromirski.net
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp>
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/**pipermail/cisco-nsp/<http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/>
>