[c-nsp] 7200/7600 LLQ Wierd Problem

[ar]

Hi Saku.

Your configuration actually works for my SIP600 interface Gi4/0/3.1500. Thank you so much for this.

Yes my other sub-interface uses the priority command.
Here's my config for Gi4/0/3.

interface GigabitEthernet4/0/3.1554
  service-policy output 1M

policy-map 1M
  class class-default
    shape average 1000000
   service-policy QOS


policy-map QOS
  class VOICE
    priority percent 60

Anyway, ill have to change this.


My only remaining problem now is on the 7200.
Hope somebody has experience on this error.






________________________________
 From: Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi>
To: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net> 
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200/7600 LLQ Wierd Problem
 
On (2012-01-17 19:46 +0800), ar wrote:

> I can attach it to Gi0/2.1554  but I cant configure it at Gi0/2.1500.
> 
> This is annoying and weird. 
> 
> I have same policy say, shaping at 1Mbps with still  a child policy-map of QOS and  is working at Gi0/2.1518.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/shared_port_adapters/configuration/6500series/76cfgsip.html#wp1208242

According to table 4-9, priority percent is not supported on SIP600. Are
you sure it actually works in some subinterface we're you've applied, and
do you know how to check it from hardware what was programmed?
I personally wouldn't spend too much time on this, and would just do
separate 'priority' command and separate 'police percent X'.

I've often seen config on on ES+, ES20 and SIP400 which was taken in
(perhaps with message in 'show log' complaining, but not applied to
hardware)

-- 
  ++ytti
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/