[c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

[Mark Tinka]

On Friday, January 27, 2012 01:00:30 PM Christian Meutes 
wrote:

> Not only. In the newest code, 15.1(2)EY1a, LLQ got
> broken: It's not not anymore possible to configure a
> policy-map with bandwidth-classes /and/ a
> priority-class. When trying to place it egress on an
> interface the code will reject.

:-(.

We just gave up entirely on using egress policer on 
customer-facing interfaces until all queues are supported. 
It's not consistent to have some shapers and some policers 
for customer links.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20120127/bdcc9cdc/attachment.sig>