[c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

[Waris Sagheer (waris)]

Hi Christian,
The issue has been fixed and the fix will be available in the next release coming out early March.

-Waris


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Christian Meutes
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 9:01 PM
To: mtinka at globaltransit.net
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:04:50 +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:

> The only issue you'll face now for the ME3600X/3800X is the
> lack of egress policing for non-LLQ queues. But gladly,
> that's just a software fix, so you can live with shapers for
> now until egress policers arrive for all classes.

Not only. In the newest code, 15.1(2)EY1a, LLQ got broken: It's not
not anymore possible to configure a policy-map with bandwidth-classes
/and/ a priority-class. When trying to place it egress on an interface
the code will reject.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/