[c-nsp] ASR1002 + ASR 1004

[Mark Tinka]

On Monday, January 30, 2012 11:15:19 PM Ian Hiddleston 
wrote:

> We're running some of the ASR1002 modular units in our
> network at the moment and are quite happy with them so
> far. I'm more tempted to run pairs of 1002's than 1006's
> with dual RP, but that's just me.

In peering/transit roles, the ASR1002 also makes more sense 
in some PoP's, because smaller, powerful boxes in more 
numbers offers more redundancy than one larger one even with 
a bit of HA.

But for P/PE roles in very small PoP's, the ASR1006 would be 
my first choice if considering it as an option.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20120131/bfd9814c/attachment.sig>