[c-nsp] OSPFv3 Adjacency issues between 2921 and 3750
Pete Lumbis
alumbis at gmail.com
Mon Jul 2 23:27:19 EDT 2012
Any difference without authentication? Does the 3750 respond to pings
to ff02::5?
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Peter Subnovic
<cnspmail002 at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Dear list members,
>
> i am having a somewhat odd issue (again) and i am out of ideas what is
> causing it.
>
> Let's assume the following very simple topology
>
> 2921 <----> 3750G-24PS
>
> All i want is to establish an OSPFv3 Adjacency between these two devices.
> Here is where the fun (headache) begins:
>
> The 2921 is running 15.1(4)M3 and the 3750G is running 12.2(55)SE5.
>
> So i configured OSPv3 on both sides on the respective Interfaces and
> wondered why the adjacency wont come up.
>
> After a little bit of troubleshooting it appears that the 3750G does not
> "recognize" the hello packets from the 2921. I can see in the debug output
> that they are received by the switch, but the OSPFv3 Process does not
> recognize them as such.
>
> Please see the debug output below: I had debugging for IPv6 Packets and
> OSPFv3 Hellos enabled. FE80::1 = 2921, FE80::2 = 3750G
>
> Jun 30 17:00:38.347 CEST: IPV6: source FE80::1 (GigabitEthernet1/0/24)
> Jun 30 17:00:38.347 CEST: dest FF02::5
> Jun 30 17:00:38.347 CEST: traffic class 224, flow 0x0, len 80+14,
> prot 89, hops 1, forward to ulp
> Jun 30 17:00:41.057 CEST: OSPFv3: Send hello to FF02::5 area 0 on
> GigabitEthernet1/0/24 from FE80::2 interface ID 1040
> Jun 30 17:00:41.057 CEST: IPV6: source FE80::2 (local)
> Jun 30 17:00:41.057 CEST: dest FF02::5 (GigabitEthernet1/0/24)
> Jun 30 17:00:41.057 CEST: traffic class 224, flow 0x0, len 76+0, prot
> 89, hops 1, originating
> Jun 30 17:00:41.057 CEST: IPv6-Fwd: Sending on GigabitEthernet1/0/24
>
> As you can see, the hello packet arrives on the interface, but somehow the
> OSPFv3 process on the 3750 does not "recognize" them as such. After digging
> around i found the following bug and thought it could be related:
>
> CSCtr55645
>
> IPv6 multicast packets for routing protocols (such as OSPFv3 hello
> messages) are not enqueued to CPU queue 3 as expected.
>
> So i upgraded to 12.2(55)SE5 (where this bug should be fixed) this weekend
> in the hope to resolve issue, but still the same. I am really kinda lost
> here.
>
> The 2921 does see the hello packets from the 3750 and the adjacency is in
> the INIT State as i would have it expected.
>
> show ipv6 ospf neighbor
>
> Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Interface ID Interface
> 1.2.3.4 0 INIT/ - 00:00:36 1040
> GigabitEthernet0/1
>
> So has anybody seen this strange behavior or has an idea what is causing
> the issues? I rebooted the 3750, cleared the ospf processes on both sides,
> no luck I dont wanna rule out that i maybe just missed something.
>
> Please see below the relevant configuration of the respective Interfaces:
>
> 2921:
>
> interface GigabitEthernet0/1
> description ===XXX===
> ip address XXX
> no ip redirects
> no ip proxy-arp
> ip flow ingress
> ip flow egress
> ip ospf authentication message-digest
> ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 7
> ip ospf network point-to-point
> ip ospf 1 area 0
> load-interval 30
> duplex auto
> speed auto
> ipv6 address FE80::1 link-local
> ipv6 enable
> ipv6 nd ra suppress all
> no ipv6 redirects
> ipv6 ospf network point-to-point
> ipv6 ospf 1 area 0
> no cdp enable
> no mop enabled
>
> ipv6 router ospf 1
> router-id 1.1.1.1
>
> =======================
>
> 3750G
>
> interface GigabitEthernet1/0/24
> description ===xxx===
> no switchport
> ip address xxx 255.255.255.252
> no ip proxy-arp
> no ip redirects
> ip ospf authentication message-digest
> ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 7 xxx
> ip ospf network point-to-point
> ip ospf 1 area 0
> no keepalive
> ipv6 address FE80::2 link-local
> ipv6 enable
> ipv6 nd ra suppress
> no ipv6 redirects
> ipv6 ospf network point-to-point
> ipv6 ospf 1 area 0
> no cdp enable
>
> ipv6 router ospf 1
> router-id 1.2.3.4
> log-adjacency-changes
>
> If you need any additional input or show commands, please dont hesitate to
> ask.
>
> I appreciate all hints/comments.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list