[c-nsp] Small, Low Power Cisco Router Recommendation

[Rusty Dekema]

Hmm. Of the options presented so far, this Mikrotik RB750 sounds the most
promising.

I've found that Linksys products have a tendency to partially or completely
fail on a regular basis for no apparent reason. The Cisco 819, however, is
far too expensive for this penny-ante project.

The Cisco 806, on the other hand, looks great, especially for the 1mbit
application. Is there another Cisco router like that but with 10/100
Ethernet ports? If so, that would probably be the ideal. [I'll be buying
these on eBay anyway, so it doesn't matter if it's EOL. And at prices like
this, one can afford a spare or two...]

Thanks again,
Rusty D




On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Roy <r.engehausen at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> Mikrotik :-)  The RB750 will do it
>
>
> On 7/19/2012 5:19 PM, Rusty Dekema wrote:
>
>> Good evening,
>>
>> This question is a bit far afield for this list, but I need a reliable,
>> quiet-or-silent, low-power-consumption Cisco router with two 10 or 10/100
>> Ethernet ports. All they need to do is do a default route with NAT between
>> the Ethernet interfaces. One of them will only have to handle 1 mbit (max)
>> of traffic; the other could receive traffic bursts up to 30 mbit, although
>> it would still be acceptable if it can only push 10-15mbit.
>>
>> Low cost, quiet/silent operation, and low power consumption are the
>> primary
>> requirements here. Any suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rusty D
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp>
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/**pipermail/cisco-nsp/<http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/>
>> .
>>
>>
>