[c-nsp] Carrier grade NAT44 & newest Cisco boxes

[Xu Hu]

Actually in our 3G network, we use the 7609 (two ACE modules) for the NAT,
in the live situation, we had 4M users.
It is quite stable for now.
Also we bought the ASR9K to expand the 3G network, maybe will migrate the
NAT to ASR9K.

Xu Hu
2012/3/14 Ruslan Pustovoitov <rus-p at mostelekom.net>

> The question was what strategy of NAT deployment can be accepted by large
> ISP if one of the internal condition to use only cisco boxes for NAT ?
> Hidden cost was always visible to engeneers )
> Now It is time to pay )
>
> Has cisco plan to announce in next two year sucsessor of ISM-100 with
> better performance ?
> For example, if ISP already has asr9k chassis placed everywere in it's
> network, it will be happy to know that in 2013 cisco planning to do another
> card which will seat instead of ISM-100 into the same chassis.
>
>
>
> Gert Doering пишет:
>
>  Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 07:01:10PM +0400, Ruslan Pustovoitov wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Does this question not worry community ?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I think it's great that the hidden costs that come with running IPv4
>> now start being openly visible...
>>
>> Sorry, what was the question?
>>
>> gert
>>
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp>
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/**pipermail/cisco-nsp/<http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/>
>