[c-nsp] Dell switches (specifically PowerConnect 7048P) and Ciscos

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 03:22:27PM -0500, Chuck Church wrote:
> Just curious, is the VLAN mapping to instances the big issue you guys have
> with MST?  In our deployments we used pretty large ranges to cover growth,
> and mapped purposes such as L2-only VLANs (no SVI), servers, users, VoIP,
> etc into separate instances, worked pretty solidly.   Except when Nexus
> changes the mappings on you because some are reserved that is...

"This link is full, I want *that* VLAN to go over *there* as preferred
path".  Blam, MST topology change, game over.

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20121127/0db1e0fd/attachment.sig>