[c-nsp] [j-nsp] ASR9001 vs MX80

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday, August 07, 2012 08:22:37 AM William Jackson 
wrote:

> Having used the MX80 in a previous position and now being
> prompted to look at the ASR 9001, I was wondering if any
> people have operational experience with the ASR9001
> platform? Or any thoughts on comparison.

I see no one replied to this; probably because the box is 
still new and most operators may not have put them into 
production yet.

I'm looking at deploying some before December (likely, 
alongside some MX80's, as it were). In case I do, and you 
haven't yet done yours, I'll be happy to share feedback.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20121001/f9fae051/attachment.sig>