[c-nsp] EIGRP in CSC
Mohammad Khalil
eng_mssk at hotmail.com
Tue Apr 9 08:40:12 EDT 2013
No , each site is connected to different PE , The rip routes are being redistributed into BGP on a router , the other one redistributes eigrp routes into bgp on the other PE
> Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 21:32:22 +1000
> From: andrew at 2sheds.de
> To: adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk
> CC: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net; gunner_200 at live.com
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP in CSC
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Adam Vitkovsky <adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk>wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I guess the problem is you are trying to redistribute routes originated in
> > RIP from MP-BGP to EIGRP.
> >
>
> Where did that come from?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > Hi I designed a topology and configured OSPF between PE and carrier CE ,
> > and
> > RIPv2 between CE - CEAll is working fine , when I changed the routing
> > protocol on one of the sites to EIGRP I no longer can access this sitesIs
> > there any thing related to EIGRP when it's running as the CE - CE IGP ?
> >
>
> Do you have 2 carrier CEs or is one yours and one the carriers?
>
> My understanding of your situation is:
>
> CE1 <-> PE routing protocol is OSPF
> CE2 <-> PE routing protocol is OSPF
>
> CE1 <-> CE2 RIP.
>
> If you only move on of the CEs to EIGRP, then how are the two CEs ment to
> communicate with one another?
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list