[c-nsp] Using EoMPLS instead of end to end VLAN
Arie Vayner (avayner)
avayner at cisco.com
Wed Apr 10 14:09:37 EDT 2013
Port based EoMPLS would not allow you to terminate the PW on a L3 interface on the 7600 for IP and BGP...
It can be done if you have UNI facing ES20/ES+ modules on the 7600. ASR9K can do it too.
It is called "Routed Pseudowire"/"L3 Pseudowire"/"SVI based Pseudowire".
Some references:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2120926
http://ccie-in-3-months.blogspot.com/2009/06/eompls-on-7600-pfc-based-svi-based.html
Arie
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Lixfeld
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 10:56
To: Antonis Vosdoganis
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net NSP
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Using EoMPLS instead of end to end VLAN
You can do port-based EoMPLS quite easily.
ME3600:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/metro/me3600x_3800x/software/release/12.2_52_ey/configuration/guide/swmpls.html
7600:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/ios/15S/configuration/guide/pfc3mpls.html
On 2013-04-10, at 1:14 PM, Antonis Vosdoganis <avosdo at gmail.com> wrote:
> We have a BGP session with a carrier delivered on ME3600-A. Because
> ME3600 is not able to carry bgp table we have create vlan 100 and we
> and made the gigabit port access to vlan 100.
>
> 7609 <---------- ME3600-B <--------- ME3600-A <------- BGP SESSION
>
> ME3600-A
> vlan 100
> name BGP_PEERING
>
> interface GigabitEthernet0/1
> description BGP_PEERING
> switchport access vlan 100
>
> ME3600-A and ME3600-B are interconnected with a trunk port.
>
> ME3600-B
> vlan 100
> name BGP_PEERING
>
> ME3600-B and 7609 are also interconnected with a trunk port
>
> CISCO 7609-S
> vlan 100
> name BGP_PEERING
>
> interface Vlan100
> description BGP_PEERING
> ip address XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX 255.255.255.248
>
> In all trunk ports we are using mpls enabled SVIs.
>
> So the vlan 100 travels all the way from ME3600-A to 7609 and the bgp
> session is running on 7609.
>
>
> I am trying to say is it possible to replace the vlan with EoMPLS and how?
>
> Best Regards
>
> Antonis.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list