[c-nsp] Using EoMPLS instead of end to end VLAN

[Mattias Gyllenvarg]

Multihop BGP would give you the benefit of any redundancy you have along
the path.


On 10 April 2013 19:14, Antonis Vosdoganis <avosdo at gmail.com> wrote:

> We have a BGP session with a carrier delivered on ME3600-A. Because ME3600
> is not able to carry bgp table we have create vlan 100 and we and made the
> gigabit port access to vlan 100.
>
> 7609 <---------- ME3600-B <--------- ME3600-A <------- BGP SESSION
>
>  ME3600-A
> vlan 100
> name BGP_PEERING
>
>  interface GigabitEthernet0/1
> description BGP_PEERING
> switchport access vlan 100
>
>  ME3600-A and ME3600-B are interconnected with a trunk port.
>
>  ME3600-B
> vlan 100
> name BGP_PEERING
>
>  ME3600-B and 7609 are also interconnected with a trunk port
>
>  CISCO 7609-S
> vlan 100
> name BGP_PEERING
>
>  interface Vlan100
> description BGP_PEERING
> ip address XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX 255.255.255.248
>
> In all trunk ports we are using mpls enabled SVIs.
>
>  So the vlan 100 travels all the way from ME3600-A to 7609 and the bgp
> session is running on 7609.
>
>
> I am trying to say is it possible to replace the vlan with EoMPLS and how?
>
>  Best Regards
>
>  Antonis.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>



-- 
*Med Vänliga Hälsningar - Best Regards*

*Mattias Gyllenvarg*
*Nätutveckling*
Bredband2

Tel: +46 406219712