[c-nsp] VRF and non-VRF on the same physical interface

[Jason Lixfeld]

>From my experience, 15.2 is riddled with bugs.  First thing I'd do is get off of 15.2.  15.3(2)S seems to be working well for me so far.

--

Sent from my mobile device


On 2013-04-12, at 7:19 PM, Eric A Louie <elouie at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Platform ME-3600X, IOS 15.2
> 
> I've got point to multipoint connection on the GigE interface, a base radio and 
> 2 sector radios.  I've been trying to get both a VRF SVI  and a non-VRF SVI to 
> work over that same physical interface.  
> 
> 
> Here's what I've done so far:
> 1. Created a no switchport physical interface and had multiple IP addresses on 
> the interface.  I can have different IPs on the different sector radios.  That 
> works.
> 2. Created a VLAN 100 interface with multiple IPs and switchport access on the 
> physical interface.  That works
> 3. Created a VLAN 100 interface with VRF and multiple IP, and service instance 
> and bridge-domain on the physical interface.  works if I use encap default or 
> encap untagged.  Does not work if I encap dot1q 100
> 4. Created VLAN 100 with VRF and VLAN 101 without.  2 service instances both 
> with bridge-domains, but the only service instance that works is the encap 
> default or encap untagged.
> 
> So it seems I have tagging issues - Can I eliminate the VLAN tag for the service 
> instance that isn't working?  If so, how?
> 
> Thanks
> Eric
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/