[c-nsp] VRF and non-VRF on the same physical interface

Jason Lixfeld jason at lixfeld.ca
Fri Apr 12 19:44:49 EDT 2013

>From my experience, 15.2 is riddled with bugs.  First thing I'd do is get off of 15.2.  15.3(2)S seems to be working well for me so far.


Sent from my mobile device

On 2013-04-12, at 7:19 PM, Eric A Louie <elouie at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Platform ME-3600X, IOS 15.2
> I've got point to multipoint connection on the GigE interface, a base radio and 
> 2 sector radios.  I've been trying to get both a VRF SVI  and a non-VRF SVI to 
> work over that same physical interface.  
> Here's what I've done so far:
> 1. Created a no switchport physical interface and had multiple IP addresses on 
> the interface.  I can have different IPs on the different sector radios.  That 
> works.
> 2. Created a VLAN 100 interface with multiple IPs and switchport access on the 
> physical interface.  That works
> 3. Created a VLAN 100 interface with VRF and multiple IP, and service instance 
> and bridge-domain on the physical interface.  works if I use encap default or 
> encap untagged.  Does not work if I encap dot1q 100
> 4. Created VLAN 100 with VRF and VLAN 101 without.  2 service instances both 
> with bridge-domains, but the only service instance that works is the encap 
> default or encap untagged.
> So it seems I have tagging issues - Can I eliminate the VLAN tag for the service 
> instance that isn't working?  If so, how?
> Thanks
> Eric
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list