[c-nsp] Routed Pseudowire

[George Giannousopoulos]

Hi Antonis,

What IOS version are you running on the 7600?

If you are on a 15.x train, you need at least 15.2(4)M
In fact it is referenced in the 15.2(2)S release notes.



On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Antonis Vosdoganis <avosdo at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello Arie
>
> We are using  ES20+
>
> Regards
>
> Antonis
> Στις 15 Απρ 2013 6:36 μ.μ., ο χρήστης "Arie Vayner (avayner)" <
> avayner at cisco.com> έγραψε:
>
> > Antonis,
> >
> > What kind of HW do you have on your 7600? You need ES20/ES+ on the
> > interface facing the ME3600 to be able to terminate a PW on a L3
> interface.
> >
> > Arie
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> > Antonis Vosdoganis
> > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 05:49
> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [c-nsp] Routed Pseudowire
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > We are trying to establish ip connectivity a host and an SVI
> >
> > HOST(192.168.33.2/24)----->ME3600------>7609(SVI:192.168.33.1/24)
> >
> > ME3600
> >
> > vlan 250
> > name RPW
> >
> > interface GigabitEthernet0/23
> > switchport trunk allowed vlan none
> > switchport mode trunk
> > service instance 250 ethernet
> > encapsulation untagged
> > bridge-domain 250
> >
> >
> > interface Vlan250
> > no ip address
> > xconnect 172.16.0.0 250 encapsulation mpls
> >
> >
> > 7609
> >
> > vlan 250
> > name RPW
> >
> >
> > interface Vlan250
> > ip address 192.168.33.2 255.255.255.0
> > xconnect 172.18.0.17 250 encapsulation mpls
> >
> >
> > Keep in mind 7609 has only one core facing L3 interface.
> >
> >
> > From mpls l2 detailed
> >
> >
> > 7609
> >
> >
> > VC statistics:
> > transit packet totals: receive 29, send 0 transit byte totals:  receive
> > 4252, send 0 transit packet drops:  receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
> >
> >
> > 3600
> >
> > VC statistics:
> >
> > transit packet totals: receive 0, send 31 transit byte totals:  receive
> 0,
> > send 4496 transit packet drops:  receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
> >
> > Packet recieved from 3600 no packets send from 7609.
> > Any ideas? I have read that this is a working scenario.
> > Regards
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>