[c-nsp] Routed Pseudowire

[Antonis Vosdoganis]

Dear  Arie - George

For case of simplicity i haven't mention that actual topology is like this.

HOST(192.168.33.2/24) ------>ME3600----------->ME3600------>7609(SVI:
192.168.33.1/24)
                                       EFP
L2+SVI                 L3

The backbone link between ME3600 is L2+SVI. Today i have made some testing
bypassing the L2+SVI link and the routed pseudowire worked. So I suppose if
the whole core mpls links are L3, Routed PSW should normally work.

Anyway. Many Thanks for you help.

Antonis.


On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:42 PM, George Giannousopoulos
<ggiannou at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Antonis,
>
> What IOS version are you running on the 7600?
>
> If you are on a 15.x train, you need at least 15.2(4)M
> In fact it is referenced in the 15.2(2)S release notes.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Antonis Vosdoganis <avosdo at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello Arie
>>
>> We are using  ES20+
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Antonis
>> Στις 15 Απρ 2013 6:36 μ.μ., ο χρήστης "Arie Vayner (avayner)" <
>> avayner at cisco.com> έγραψε:
>>
>> > Antonis,
>> >
>> > What kind of HW do you have on your 7600? You need ES20/ES+ on the
>> > interface facing the ME3600 to be able to terminate a PW on a L3
>> interface.
>> >
>> > Arie
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
>> > Antonis Vosdoganis
>> > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 05:49
>> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> > Subject: [c-nsp] Routed Pseudowire
>> >
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > We are trying to establish ip connectivity a host and an SVI
>> >
>> > HOST(192.168.33.2/24)----->ME3600------>7609(SVI:192.168.33.1/24)
>> >
>> > ME3600
>> >
>> > vlan 250
>> > name RPW
>> >
>> > interface GigabitEthernet0/23
>> > switchport trunk allowed vlan none
>> > switchport mode trunk
>> > service instance 250 ethernet
>> > encapsulation untagged
>> > bridge-domain 250
>> >
>> >
>> > interface Vlan250
>> > no ip address
>> > xconnect 172.16.0.0 250 encapsulation mpls
>> >
>> >
>> > 7609
>> >
>> > vlan 250
>> > name RPW
>> >
>> >
>> > interface Vlan250
>> > ip address 192.168.33.2 255.255.255.0
>> > xconnect 172.18.0.17 250 encapsulation mpls
>> >
>> >
>> > Keep in mind 7609 has only one core facing L3 interface.
>> >
>> >
>> > From mpls l2 detailed
>> >
>> >
>> > 7609
>> >
>> >
>> > VC statistics:
>> > transit packet totals: receive 29, send 0 transit byte totals:  receive
>> > 4252, send 0 transit packet drops:  receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>> >
>> >
>> > 3600
>> >
>> > VC statistics:
>> >
>> > transit packet totals: receive 0, send 31 transit byte totals:  receive
>> 0,
>> > send 4496 transit packet drops:  receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>> >
>> > Packet recieved from 3600 no packets send from 7609.
>> > Any ideas? I have read that this is a working scenario.
>> > Regards
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>
>