[c-nsp] SPA-1X10GE-WL-V2 vs SPA-1X10GE-L-V2

[Edward Salonia]

WL does LANPHY, WANPHY, and SONET/SDH.
L does only LANPHY

If you are just using this for 10gige LAN interconnect, use the L. If you need WAN/SONET support, get the WL.

- Ed
-----Original Message-----
From: Lee Starnes <lee.t.starnes at gmail.com>
Sender: "cisco-nsp" <cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net>Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:12:26 
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [c-nsp] SPA-1X10GE-WL-V2 vs SPA-1X10GE-L-V2

Hello,

I was wondering if anyone here has used the SPA-1X10GE-WL-V2 and if so how
it differs with the non "W" version with relation to Ethernet and
EtherBundles.

We currently use the non "W" versions for our ethernet uplinks to backbone
connections as well as between our switches and routers. In some cases, we
do EtherBundles for 20 or 30G links. I was wondering if the "W" version
would have any issues with this or if it's only difference is the ability
to do POS.

-Lee
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/