[c-nsp] behavior of BGP when new address families are enabled (BGP dynamic capability)

[Mark Tinka]

On Friday, August 09, 2013 10:28:31 AM Adam Vitkovsky wrote:

> I believe the multi-instance BGP was created mainly to
> cope with the 4G limit per process in 32bit XR.

Messy if that's the reason.

IOS is loaded with all sorts of goo to fix other bits of goo 
(like the voice switches of old that had half the code 
keeping an eye on the working half).

Because of the architecture limitations of QNX, I'm hoping 
Cisco don't end up messing up IOS XR to counteract that. 
With Blackberry being sold off, who knows what the future of 
QNX is? After all this time and no 64-bit microkernel 
support. Amazing!

It's a shame that the CRS RP's ship with 12GB of RAM, and 
using all that doesn't come free(ly).

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20130824/83510fd8/attachment.sig>