[c-nsp] Sup2T - poor netflow performance

[Chris Welti]

Am 18/10/13 16:57, schrieb Roland Dobbins:
>
> Chris Welti <chris.welti at switch.ch> wrote:
>
>> ingress and egress on the same interface is a configuration officially 
>> supported by Cisco for the Sup2T. Escpecially for the Sup2T-XL/DFC4-XL 
>> which has separate netflow tables for ingress and egress, there should 
>> be no overflow issues due to this.
> I've not read anywhere or been told that ingress & egress is now officially supported on Sup2T, & would be grateful for any pointers you can share, thanks!  

Sorry for the late reply. Cisco had confirmed that is supported when I
opened a case about poor performance.
Also, see
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/white_paper_c11-652021.html
Look at Figure 12.

Regards,
Chris