[c-nsp] pros and cons for IPTV multicast in rosen-mvpn vs GRT

[Adam Vitkovsky]

Yes it's additional complexity indeed, though we would use SSM so no RPs in
the core and no inter-as mvpns(so far :) ) so need for RPF proxy-vectors
Yes I'd love to go with MLDP though unfortunately it's not supported on
me3600's

adam
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Meutes [mailto:christian at errxtx.net] 
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 5:05 PM
To: Adam Vitkovsky
Cc: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] pros and cons for IPTV multicast in rosen-mvpn vs GRT

A lot of complexity, protocol overhead, data mdt scalability, more state,
more bugs, PIM pimping / RPF vector, more RPs in case of sparse-mode... 

If VPN is mandatory I would go MLDP if  supported.

--
   Christian

On 18.02.2013, at 16:09, Adam Vitkovsky <adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk> wrote:

> Hi folks,
> Are there any cons for running IPTV in draft-rosen-mvpn as opposed to 
> global routing table
> 
> adam
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/