[c-nsp] Next step-up from 7206VXR
Jon Lewis
jlewis at lewis.org
Wed Feb 20 02:25:44 EST 2013
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Pete Lumbis wrote:
> There are two pieces: control plane processing power and TCAM.
>
> Sup720 CPU can't really keep up with the average churn of the internet
> anymore. RSP720's and Sup2T CPUs can still keep up.
I'm using Sup720s, and not seeing that.
> Both RSP720-3CXL and Sup2T-XL can support 1 million routes*
The Sup720 can do 1 million routes too. Can you point out where cisco
says the implementation is any different between the Sup720, RSP720, and
Sup2T that makes the latter capable of handling more v4/v6 routes than the
former. Everything I've seen says the FIB TCAM space has not been
improved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route
Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are
Atlantic Net |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list