[c-nsp] Next step-up from 7206VXR

[Mikael Abrahamsson]

On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Jon Lewis wrote:

> The Sup720 can do 1 million routes too.  Can you point out where cisco 
> says the implementation is any different between the Sup720, RSP720, and 
> Sup2T that makes the latter capable of handling more v4/v6 routes than 
> the former. Everything I've seen says the FIB TCAM space has not been 
> improved.

I saw an output someone pasted to me from a Sup2T indicating it would take 
1M IPv4 routes and 0.5M IPv6 routes (at the same time). I don't have 
access to one myself so I can't verify.

The major issue with Sup720 is that it's slow and I've seen them fall over 
and start losing other adjacancies when there was a lot of BGP work.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se