[c-nsp] Next step-up from 7206VXR

Seth Mattinen sethm at rollernet.us
Wed Feb 20 06:19:50 EST 2013

On 2/20/13 6:13 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Mack McBride wrote:
>> At 768k you are effectively limiting your IPv6 table to 128k (you
>> can't really go more than that if you expect to use IPv6). I recommend
>> a 640k/192k split.
> Well, I believe IPv4 will hit 640k before IPv6 will hit 128k, so I'd
> recommend 768k/128k instead.

That's what I think too, unless there are too many unchecked idiots that
decide to deaggregate their /30-32 into /48s.


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list