[c-nsp] FW: Cisco blade switch config
Kevin Berry
kevin.berry.70 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 20 08:44:58 EST 2013
?
From: Kevin Berry [mailto:kevin.berry.70 at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:46 AM
To: Rich Davies
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco blade switch config
Well, the trunk works for VLAN 1, seemingly OK......
Thes are Cisco CS3020 blade switches. Ithought they did encapsulation
802dot1q by default ?
The HP shows this:
ROOT-LAB10# show lacp
LACP
PORT LACP TRUNK PORT LACP LACP
NUMB ENABLED GROUP STATUS PARTNER STATUS
---- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
20 Passive 20 Up No Success
21 Active Trk1 Down No Success
22 Active Trk1 Down No Success
23 Passive 23 Up No Success
35 Passive 35 Up No Success
36 Passive 36 Down No Success
37 Active Trk2 Up Yes Success
38 Active Trk2 Up Yes Success
My LACP uplinks are on 21&22 and 37 & 38. I currently have 1 down because
switch is pulled on Cisco side.
| Intrusion MDI Flow Bcast
Port Type | Alert Enabled Status Mode Mode Ctrl Limit
21-Trk1 21-Trk1 | No Yes Down 1000FDx MDI off 0
22-Trk1 22-Trk1 | No Yes Down 1000FDx MDI off 0
23 23 | No Yes Up 100FDx MDIX off 0
36 36 | No Yes Down 1000FDx MDI off 0
37-Trk2 37-Trk2 | No Yes Up 1000FDx MDIX off 0
38-Trk2 38-Trk2 | No Yes Up 1000FDx MDI off 0
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Rich Davies <rich.davies at gmail.com> wrote:
What mode of trunking is the HP switch doing? I believe by default Cisco
does ISL for trunk mode. If the HP is doing dot1q then you need to define
that on the Cisco side since ISL is default:
interface x/y
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
Hope this helps.
Rich
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Kevin Berry <kevin.berry.70 at gmail.com>
wrote:
I have (2) Cisco blade switches running in redundant mode and each is
connected to the same HP ROOT switch on the other end. Each blade switch
has an LACP / Etherchannel link of 2 cables going to the HP root. STP
enabled on the Cisco's.
Noticed this on my Cisco-SW1 today:
Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-------------------------------------------
----
1 Po1(SU) LACP Gi0/1(I) Gi0/2(I) Gi0/3(I)
Gi0/4(D) Gi0/5(D) Gi0/6(I)
Gi0/7(D) Gi0/8(I) Gi0/20(P)
Gi0/22(P)
This shows that gi 0/20 & 0/22 are in use and bundled in port channel as
they should be. My blade servers (gi 0/1 - 0/8) (some of which are down I
know) show (I) independant? Can anyone advise why?
Also, anyone know why a server like gi 0/1 for example will not talk on
multiple vlans?
I mean, they are set correctly on the HP, as I can ping out fine to those
vlans over there. Here is the Cisco config for those vlans. Cisco talks on
VLAN 1 fine. But Vlans 2 & 3, it doesnt.
!
spanning-tree mode pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
spanning-tree uplinkfast
no spanning-tree vlan 4-99
!
vlan internal allocation policy ascending
!
!
!
interface Port-channel1
description HP CORE
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-3,100
switchport mode trunk
spanning-tree portfast trunk
spanning-tree vlan 4-99 cost 20
!
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-3,100
switchport mode trunk
speed 1000
channel-group 1 mode active
spanning-tree portfast
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-3,100
switchport mode trunk
speed 1000
channel-group 1 mode active
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/20
description HP CORE
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-3,100
switchport mode trunk
channel-protocol lacp
channel-group 1 mode active
spanning-tree portfast trunk
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/21
no switchport
no ip address
shutdown
spanning-tree portfast trunk
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/22
description HP CORE
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-3,100
switchport mode trunk
channel-protocol lacp
channel-group 1 mode active
spanning-tree portfast trunk
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/23
description INTERNAL CROSSCONNECT
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-3,100
switchport mode trunk
media-type internal
channel-protocol lacp
spanning-tree portfast trunk
interface GigabitEthernet0/24
description INTERNAL CROSSCONNECT
no switchport
no ip address
no ip route-cache
media-type internal
spanning-tree portfast
!
interface Vlan1
ip address 10.10.0.18 255.255.0.0
no ip route-cache
no ip mroute-cache
!
interface Vlan2
no ip address
no ip route-cache
no ip mroute-cache
!
interface Vlan3
no ip address
no ip route-cache
no ip route-cache
--------------------------------------------------
Anyone can help?????
VLAN 1 is 10.10.0.x
VLAN 2 is 172.18.32.x
VLAN 3 is 192.168.1.x
I can only ping 10.10.0.x n VLAN 1, so traffic moves accros these
LACP/etherchannel fine, but only for that VLAN.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list