[c-nsp] Port-channel configuration "stickiness"...

[Tassos Chatzithomaoglou]

You have to keep in mind that there are some commands, mostly L1/L2 related, that apply
only to individual members, so things can sometimes get more tricky.
Hopefully you'll get a warning and nothing more if you try to configure them under the
port-channel interface.

--
Tassos

A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk wrote on 19/1/2013 14:57:
> Hi,
>
>> Known bug?  Feature?  You can alter a port-channel configuration and
>> expect it to propagate to the members, correct?
> yes - changes to the port-channel are propagated to the members... if you do it the
> other way around then the interface WONT match the port-channel and the link will go down.
> (and if you only have a single member on that port-channel due to eg a link being currently
> down then that could mean no service/access to the end of that link - classic chop
> your feet off)
>
> not seen your issue (ie ALWAYS add to the PoXX and seen the changes work..)
>
> alan
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>