[c-nsp] MPLS down to the CPE
Phil Bedard
philxor at gmail.com
Mon Jul 8 14:01:42 EDT 2013
I have been looking over those drafts and like what I see thus far, makes
perfect sense. Too bad it didn't exist 4 years ago. :)
Phil
On 7/8/13 11:31 AM, "Saku Ytti" <saku at ytti.fi> wrote:
>On (2013-07-08 17:14 +0200), Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>> We, at the time, opted to wait for IP LFA since RSVP-TE in
>> the Access (even just to the adjacent PE routers) just
>> didn't look administratively feasible, let alone scale :-).
>
>Even tLDP needed for rLFA is less than desirable, additional states
>seemingly arbitrarily signalled up and down. Segment routing[0] provides
>100% coverage for LFA like functionality without any additional signalling
>between the devices.
>
>[0]
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-filsfils-rtgwg-segment-routing-use-cases-
>00#section-3
>
>EFT program exists for IOS-XR/ASR9k at least.
>--
> ++ytti
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list