[c-nsp] MPLS down to the CPE

Phil Bedard philxor at gmail.com
Mon Jul 8 14:01:42 EDT 2013

I have been looking over those drafts and like what I see thus far, makes
perfect sense.  Too bad it didn't exist 4 years ago. :)


On 7/8/13 11:31 AM, "Saku Ytti" <saku at ytti.fi> wrote:

>On (2013-07-08 17:14 +0200), Mark Tinka wrote:
>> We, at the time, opted to wait for IP LFA since RSVP-TE in
>> the Access (even just to the adjacent PE routers) just
>> didn't look administratively feasible, let alone scale :-).
>Even tLDP needed for rLFA is less than desirable, additional states
>seemingly arbitrarily signalled up and down.  Segment routing[0] provides
>100% coverage for LFA like functionality without any additional signalling
>between the devices.
>EFT program exists for IOS-XR/ASR9k at least.
>  ++ytti
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list