[c-nsp] Private IP in SP Core

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Sat Jul 13 09:44:00 EDT 2013

On Monday, March 11, 2013 02:18:39 PM Gordon Bryan wrote:

> I think I'll stick with public IPs on the core,
> aggerssive iACLs on ingress and the Internet in the
> global table. This for me seems the simplest, most
> supportable and widely deployed option. 

Since there is also no current MPLS support for IPv6, and 
assuming 6PE wasn't an option for you, you likely want 
consistency between your IPv4 and IPv6 routing in the core.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20130713/6ff2e086/attachment.sig>

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list