[c-nsp] BGP neighbor fall-over vs BFD

[Mark Tinka]

On Monday, March 11, 2013 07:09:35 PM Saku Ytti wrote:

> Sorry, actually fall-over tracks route to neighbour (it
> was introduced when BGP scanner stopped doing the work,
> and BGP became trigger based maybe 7-8 years agi)

I've noticed "fall-over" implementation in IOS classic on 
the XR 12000 is not terribly as good as other platforms.

Even with "fall-over" enabled, BGP Scanner is still awfully 
busy, causing CPU hits. This isn't the case on other boxes 
(probably running more modern code, then again).

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20130714/7848d17f/attachment.sig>