[c-nsp] ASR9k sw quality (Re: Sup2T - poor netflow performance)

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Sun Jul 21 01:31:52 EDT 2013


On Wednesday, March 27, 2013 09:01:06 AM Mikael Abrahamsson 
wrote:

> 4.2.0 and 4.2.1 has generally been a complete disaster
> when it comes to software Q&A. 4.2.3 with smu pack 2
> (released end of january) seem to be a bit better, but
> I'm still worried about the SMU velocity.

It's interesting how such an improvement in router OS (with 
IOS XR) has give us upgrade and maintenance update 
procedures that take us back 20 years.

Unbeknown to me.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20130721/c629d32b/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list